Adhesion Evaluation of AG200-15: An Investigational Transdermal Contraceptive Delivery System.

INTRODUCTION: AG200-15, an investigational transdermal contraceptive delivery system or patch, is designed to be a low-dose, non-daily, combined hormonal contraceptive option for women. In this phase 1 study, the in vivo adhesion of the AG200-15 patch was compared to Xulane®, the only contraceptive patch available in the USA. METHODS: This phase 1, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, two-period crossover adhesion study compared the 7-day adhesion of the AG200-15 and Xulane contraceptive patches. Eighty-three women, ages 18 to 35 years old, with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 19 kg/m2 and < 35 kg/m2, and weight ≥ 48 kg and < 90 kg were enrolled. Trained study site personnel used a five-point scale to assess patch adhesion daily. A score of 0 reflected at least 90% adhesion; while a score of 4 represented complete detachment of the patch. The primary objective was to compare the adhesion properties of the two patches; AG200-15 would be considered statistically non-inferior to Xulane if the upper 95% confidence limit (CL) of the mean difference in adhesion scores was below + 0.15. RESULTS: The overall mean (standard deviation) scores for AG200-15 (N = 78) and Xulane (N = 77) were 0.14 (0.28) and 0.39 (0.40), respectively (lower scores on the adhesion scale indicate better adhesion). The study demonstrated a difference in mean adhesion scores of - 0.24, meeting the prespecified non-inferiority criterion by demonstrating a one-sided upper CL of - 0.16. Thus, the in vivo adhesion of AG200-15 was shown to be non-inferior to that of Xulane. Most subjects experienced no skin irritation at the application site for either patch and no serious adverse event was reported in the study. CONCLUSION: The in vivo adhesion of AG200-15 is non-inferior to that of Xulane on the basis of the prespecified criterion of the upper bound of the one-sided 95% CL for the mean adhesion score difference being below + 0.15. Both patches were generally well tolerated. FUNDING: Agile Therapeutics, Inc.

Evaluation of safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in healthy females between 9 and 26 years of age in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Due to sporadic and not easily accessible cervical cancer screening, human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cervical cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in Sub-Saharan African women. This study was designed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (qHPV) vaccine in sub-Saharan African women. This seven month, double-blind study enrolled 250 healthy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-uninfected females ages 9-26 residing in Ghana, Kenya, and Senegal. Thirty females ages 13-15 and 120 females ages 16-26 received qHPV vaccine. In addition, 100 females ages 9-12 y were randomized in a 4:1 ratio to receive either qHPV vaccine (n = 80) or placebo (n = 20 ). The primary immunogenicity hypothesis was that an acceptable percentage of subjects who received the qHPV vaccine seroconvert to HPV6/11/16/18 at 4 weeks post-dose 3, defined as the lower bound of the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeding 90%. The primary safety objective was to demonstrate that qHPV vaccine was generally well tolerated when administered in a 3-dose regimen. The pre-specified statistical criterion for the primary immunogenicity hypothesis was met: the lower bound of the 95% exact binomial CI on the seroconversion rate was at least 98% for each vaccine HPV type and all subjects seroconverted by 4 weeks post-dose 3. Across vaccination groups, the most common adverse events (AE) were at the injection site, including pain, swelling, and erythema. No subject discontinued study medication due to an AE and no serious AEs were reported. There were no deaths. This study demonstrated that qHPV vaccination of sub-Saharan African women was highly immunogenic and generally well tolerated.

Clinical trial experience with prophylactic human papillomavirus 6/11/16/18 vaccine in young black women.

PURPOSE: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the causative agent of cervical cancer. Black women are disproportionally diagnosed and have higher mortality from cervical cancer in the United States. Here we describe the prophylactic efficacy and safety of a quadrivalent HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine in black women. METHODS: A total of 700 black women from Latin America, Europe, and North America (aged 16-24 years) received the vaccine or placebo in one of two studies. Analyses focused on the efficacy and safety of the vaccine. RESULTS: Baseline rates of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and history of past pregnancy were more than twice as high in black women compared with the non-black women who were enrolled in these trials. HPV-6/11/16 or 18 DNA was detected in 18% of black women versus 14.6% in non-black women at day 1. For black women, vaccine efficacy against disease caused by HPV-6/11/16/18 was 100% for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (0 vs. 15 cases; 95% confidence interval, 64.5%-100%) and 100% for vulvar and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia and condylomata acuminata (0 vs. 17 cases; 95% confidence interval, 69.3%-100%). There were no serious vaccine-related adverse experiences. A similar proportion of pregnancies resulted in live births (75.8% vaccine; 72.7% placebo) and fetal loss (24.2% vaccine; 27.3% placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic quadrivalent HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccination of young black women demonstrated high efficacy, safety, and tolerability. HPV vaccination has the potential to reduce cervical cancer-related health disparities both in the United States and around the world.

Immunogenicity of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (type 6/11/16/18) vaccine in males 16 to 26 years old.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection can lead to significant disease in males, including anogenital warts, intraepithelial neoplasias, and several types of oral and anogenital cancers. The quadrivalent HPV (type 6/11/16/18) L1 virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine (qHPV vaccine; Gardasil) has recently been demonstrated to prevent persistent infection and associated disease related to vaccine HPV types in males. We report the overall immunogenicity results from a trial of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine in males. Overall, 3,463 heterosexual men and 602 men who had sex with men were enrolled into a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy study. Serum samples were collected prior to vaccination at day 1 and at months 7, 24, and 36 postvaccination. Immunogenicity was evaluated with a multiplex, competitive Luminex immunoassay. Almost all subjects (97.4 to 99.2%) seroconverted for vaccine HPV types by month 7. At month 36, 88.9%, 94.0%, 97.9%, and 57.0% of subjects were still seropositive for HPV-6, -11, -16, and -18, respectively. For all vaccine HPV types, black subjects had significantly higher antibody titers at month 7 than did both Caucasian and Asian subjects. An anamnestic antibody response was seen in men seropositive before vaccination. The vaccine was highly immunogenic in males 16 to 23 years of age; responses were comparable to those observed in women. Furthermore, the immune responses were consistent with the established efficacy of the vaccine in the prevention of incident and persistent HPV infection, anogenital warts, and anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

HPV vaccine against anal HPV infection and anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: The rate of anal cancer is increasing among both women and men, particularly men who have sex with men. Caused by infection with human papillomavirus (HPV), primarily HPV type 16 or 18, anal cancer is preceded by high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (grade 2 or 3). We studied the safety and efficacy of quadrivalent HPV vaccine (qHPV) against anal intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 infection in men who have sex with men. METHODS: In a substudy of a larger double-blind study, we randomly assigned 602 healthy men who have sex with men, 16 to 26 years of age, to receive either qHPV or placebo. The primary efficacy objective was prevention of anal intraepithelial neoplasia or anal cancer related to infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18. Efficacy analyses were performed in intention-to-treat and per-protocol efficacy populations. The rates of adverse events were documented. RESULTS: Efficacy of the qHPV vaccine against anal intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 was 50.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.7 to 67.2) in the intention-to-treat population and 77.5% (95% CI, 39.6 to 93.3) in the per-protocol efficacy population; the corresponding efficacies against anal intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HPV of any type were 25.7% (95% CI, -1.1 to 45.6) and 54.9% (95% CI, 8.4 to 79.1), respectively. Rates of anal intraepithelial neoplasia per 100 person-years were 17.5 in the placebo group and 13.0 in the vaccine group in the intention-to-treat population and 8.9 in the placebo group and 4.0 in the vaccine group in the per-protocol efficacy population. The rate of grade 2 or 3 anal intraepithelial neoplasia related to infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 was reduced by 54.2% (95% CI, 18.0 to 75.3) in the intention-to-treat population and by 74.9% (95% CI, 8.8 to 95.4) in the per-protocol efficacy population. The corresponding risks of persistent anal infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 were reduced by 59.4% (95% CI, 43.0 to 71.4) and 94.9% (95% CI, 80.4 to 99.4), respectively. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the qHPV vaccine reduced the rates of anal intraepithelial neoplasia, including of grade 2 or 3, among men who have sex with men. The vaccine had a favorable safety profile and may help to reduce the risk of anal cancer. (Funded by Merck and the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00090285.).

Safety and reactogenicity of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, 18) L1 viral-like-particle vaccine in older adolescents and young adults.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic vaccination with a quadrivalent HPV (types 6, 11, 16, 18) vaccine (qHPV) has been shown to prevent infection with HPV 6/11/16/18 and associated disease in women and more recently, in men. Here we report on the safety and reactogenicity of the qHPV vaccine in males. A total of 4,065 healthy males aged 16-26 years were enrolled into a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive qHPV vaccine or placebo at day 1, month 2, and month 6. Safety and tolerability were assessed via the collection of reported adverse experiences (AEs). All serious AEs (vaccine- or procedure-related or not) and all deaths occurring during the study were recorded. Safety analyses were conducted in all subjects who received at least one dose of vaccine or placebo. The proportion of subjects who reported at least one injection-site AE was higher in the qHPV vaccine group versus the placebo group (60.1% vs 53.7%, respectively), however most of these AEs were mild/moderate in intensity. The incidence of at least one systemic AE was comparable between the vaccine and placebo groups (31.7% vs 31.4%, respectively). There were no vaccine-related serious AEs or deaths. The occurrence of AEs did not increase with each successive injection, and among trial participants who were seropositive for at least one vaccine HPV type at enrollment, the profile of adverse events was similar to that of the entire study cohort. The qHPV vaccine was generally well tolerated in males aged 16-26 years and had a favorable safety profile.

The humoral response to Gardasil over four years as defined by total IgG and competitive Luminex immunoassay.

Safe and effective vaccines against anogenital human papillomaviruses (HPV) are now available. These vaccines, composed of virus-like particles (VLPs) made from the L1 major capsid protein of specific HPV types, induce a polyclonal antibody response directed against specific conformational and linear epitopes displayed on the VLP. Numerous studies indicated the importance of neutralizing antibodies in protection from infection. However, our understanding of the antibody responses to these vaccines is not complete, and there is no established immune correlate of protection nor antibody threshold that correlates with protection against HPV infection or disease. In the current study, antibody responses of young women to Gardasil®, the quadrivalent HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18 L1 VLP vaccine (qHPV), were assessed through 48 months (M) in total IgG and competitive Luminex immunoassays (total IgG LIA and cLIA). The total IgG LIA was developed as a research assay to evaluate preclinical multivalent HPV VLP vaccine formulations. The cLIA simultaneously evaluates the antibody response to a unique conformational, neutralizing epitope on each of the four HPV types present in the quadrivalent vaccine; HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18. The same sera from women vaccinated with the qHPV vaccine were tested in both the total IgG LIA and the cLIA assays. The proportion of vaccinated women achieving seropositivity and the anti-HPV VLP total IgG and cLIA geometric mean titers (GMTs) were summarized at M7, M24, M48 based on the serostatus cut-points defined for each immunoassay. Overall, greater than 99% of subjects seroconverted to all four vaccine types in both assays; GMTs peaked at M7. For all four HPV types, regardless of the immunoassay used, the most significant decline in GMTs was observed between M7 and M24. By M24, the antibody titers had reached a plateau and minimal declines in antibody titers were observed between M24 and M48 for all four HPV types in both immunoassays. Testing the same sera, seropositivity for M48 HPV18 remained high (96.7%) in the total IgG LIA, but was 64.8% in the cLIA. The current study illustrates potential important differences in serologic assays utilized in the clinical trials of the two currently available HPV VLP vaccines (quadrivalent and bivalent). Differences in seropositivity status are attributed to the measurement parameters and sensitivity of the individual immunoassays and do not indicate reduced anti-HPV18 protective antibodies.

C terminus of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin downregulates CLDN4 and sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to Taxol and Carboplatin.

PURPOSE: We have previously shown that CLDN4 (encoding claudin-4), a cell tight junction (TJ) protein, is highly expressed in human epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOC) but undetectable in normal ovaries. CLDN4 has been identified as a specific receptor for C terminus of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (C-CPE), a nontoxic molecule that may disrupt TJ barrier function and enhance cellular absorption. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential clinical applications of C-CPE and its effects on CLDN4 expression in EOC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using a 3-dimensional culture model and monolayer culture of EOC cells, we examined the effects of C-CPE on CLDN4 expression by quantitative real-time PCR, immunofluorescence, and Western blot. The synergistic effect of C-CPE to clinically relevant chemotherapies (Taxol and Carboplatin) was observed in EOC culture and xenograft mice. Furthermore, we determined through oligonucleotide microarray analysis that the transcript profile alterations dysregulated as a consequence of C-CPE treatment. RESULTS: C-CPE treatment decreased protein expression and relocated CLDN4 from cell-cell contact regions to the cytoplasm. Particularly, C-CPE sensitized EOC cells to chemotherapeutic administration at low dosages and significantly inhibited tumor growth in a nontoxic manner. Furthermore, we provided genome-wide molecular evidence that C-CPE treatment is involved in the stimulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and the inhibition of cell metabolism in EOC cells. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of C-CPE can enhance the effectiveness of Taxol or Carboplatin and significantly inhibited EOC cell growth in a CLDN4-dependent manner, suggesting that C-CPE may have promising therapeutic potential for EOC.

External genital human papillomavirus prevalence and associated factors among heterosexual men on 5 continents.

BACKGROUND: We examined the baseline prevalence of penile, scrotal, and perineal/perianal human papillomavirus (HPV) in heterosexual men (HM). We also evaluated baseline characteristics of HM to assess factors associated with prevalent HPV detection. METHODS: We tested serum samples from 3463 HM aged 16-24 years with 1-5 lifetime female sexual partners for antibodies to HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18. We collected baseline swab specimens for the detection of DNA of HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 59 from 3 areas: penile, scrotal, and perineal/perianal. Risk factors for prevalent HPV DNA detection were evaluated. RESULTS: The prevalence of any tested HPV type was 18.7% at the penis, 13.1% at the scrotum, 7.9% at the perineal/perianal region, and 21.0% at any site. Having >3 lifetime female sexual partners had the greatest impact on HPV prevalence: odds ratio (OR) 3.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-4.9) for HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18; and OR 4.5 (95% CI 3.3-6.1) for all HPV types tested. HPV DNA detection was highest in Africa. Neither condom usage nor circumcision was associated with HPV DNA prevalence. CONCLUSION: Genital-HPV DNA detection is common in young, sexually active HM. We found HPV to be most prevalent in African men and least prevalent in men from the Asia-Pacific region. Increased numbers of sexual partners was an important risk factor for HPV DNA prevalence.

Prevalence of and risk factors for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection among HIV-seronegative men who have sex with men.

BACKGROUND: We examined the baseline prevalence of penile, scrotal, perineal/perianal, and intra-anal human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seronegative men who have sex with men (MSM). METHODS: Data were analyzed from 602 MSM aged 16-27 years with ≤ 5 lifetime sexual partners. Serum samples were tested for antibodies to HPV6/11/16/18. Swab samples were collected separately from several anogenital areas for detection of HPV6/11/16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59 DNA. RESULTS: The prevalence of any tested HPV type was 18.5% at the penis, 17.1% at the scrotum, 33.0% at the perineal/perianal region, 42.4% in the anal canal, and 48.0% at any site. Overall, 415 MSM (69.7%) were negative to HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 at enrollment by both serology and DNA detection. Men residing in Europe and Latin America had significantly increased risk of HPV infection at external genital sites and the anal canal compared to men from Australia. Tobacco use and greater number of lifetime sexual partners was associated with higher HPV infection prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HPV infection is high among young sexually active MSM, with the anal canal being the most common site of infection. Lifetime number of sexual partners was the most important modifiable risk factor for anogenital HPV infection.

Adenocarcinoma in situ and associated human papillomavirus type distribution observed in two clinical trials of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine.

The primary objective of this report is to describe the detection of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and associated human papillomavirus (HPV) type distribution that was observed in the context of two phase 3 clinical trials of a quadrivalent HPV6/11/16/18 vaccine. In this intention-to-treat analysis, we include all women who had at least one follow-up visit postenrollment. Healthy women (17,622) aged 15-26 with no history of HPV disease and a lifetime number of less than five sex partners (average follow-up of 3.6 years) were randomized (1:1) to receive vaccine or placebo at day 1, months 2, and 6. Women underwent colposcopy and biopsy according to a Papanicolaou triage algorithm. All tissue specimens were tested for 14 HPV types and were adjudicated by a pathology panel. During the trials, 22 women were diagnosed with AIS (six vaccine and 16 placebo). There were 25 AIS lesions in total, with HPV16/18 present in 96% (24 of 25 with 15 of 25 as single infections). Only two of 22 women had concomitant cytology results suggesting glandular abnormality. Colposcopic impressions (25 total) were either negative or indicated squamous lesions only. Of women with AIS, all six in the vaccine cohort and seven of 16 in the placebo cohort were infected at baseline with the same HPV type that was detected in the AIS lesion. Concurrent squamous lesions were detected in 20 of these 22 women. In summary, our findings show that AIS evades colposcopic and cervical cytologic detection. As most AIS lesions were HPV16/18-related, prophylactic HPV vaccination should reduce the incidence of invasive adenocarcinoma.

A weakly positive human papillomavirus Hybrid Capture II result correlates with a significantly lower risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2,3 after atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cytology.

OBJECTIVE: The Hybrid Capture II assay (hc2; QIAGEN, Inc) for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) is an in vitro nucleic acid hybridization assay using chemiluminescence for the qualitative detection of hrHPV DNA in cervical samples. Results are reported as a ratio of relative light units (RLUs) to a cutoff value based on a positive control. Specimens with RLU ratios of 1.0 or higher are scored positive for hrHPV. We tested the hypothesis that hrHPV positives with low-positive RLU ratios (1-10) had a lower prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2,3 (CIN 2,3) on histologic follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relative light unit ratios for 388 consecutive hrHPV-positive cervical cytologic specimens interpreted as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) were reviewed. Individual RLU ratios were compared with outcome histologic diagnosis in cases with colposcopic follow-up and tissue sampling (biopsy and/or endocervical curettage; n = 236). RESULTS: Of 236 cases with histologic follow-up, 63 had RLU ratios in the range of 1 to 10; of these, 53 (84.1%) were negative for CIN, 7 (11.1%) had CIN 1, 1 (1.6%) had CIN of uncertain grade, and 2 (3.2%) had CIN 2,3. The difference in CIN 2,3 outcome between RLU ratios of 1 to 10 (3.2%) versus over 10 (17.3%) was significant (p =.0047). The difference in prevalence of CIN 1 was not significant (p =.67). CONCLUSIONS: An RLU ratio of 10 or less was associated with a significantly lower prevalence of CIN 2,3 on biopsy outcome after a Pap test result of ASCUS. The much lower prevalence of underlying CIN 2,3 in patients who are weakly HPV-positive may justify modification of the management algorithm for this subset of women with ASCUS.

A case study: lessons learned from human papillomavirus vaccine development: approval of a vaccine for use in children and young adolescents for prevention of an adult disease.

This article presents the adolescent clinical trials program for the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (Merck and Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ) as a case study of the development of a preventive intervention for use in young adolescents to protect against a future sexually transmitted infection and its associated diseases. In light of similarities in Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and HIV with regard to sexual transmission and the associated social and ethical issues related to prevention trial development, lessons learned from the approach taken to the inclusion of adolescents in the quadrivalent HPV vaccine program have potential relevance to future HIV prevention trials. Epidemiologic support for HPV vaccination in adolescents and a regulatory-approved approach to immunogenicity studies for bridging of efficacy from adults formed the basis for including young adolescents in the HPV program. The successful achievement of regulatory approval for use of this prophylactic intervention in young adolescents for prevention of a sexually transmitted infection that is most frequently not acquired before mid to late adolescence required understanding of the particular challenges of studying the vulnerable adolescent population with respect to issues such as federal regulations, the role of parents, confidentiality, empowerment, and retention, and awareness of the social and political context within which prevention interventions are introduced.

Use of multimedia as an educational tool to improve human papillomavirus vaccine acceptability--a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine, through a pilot study, whether use of a video-based educational tool can influence overall human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine acceptability, views on vaccine mandates, school vaccination, and acceptable age for vaccination. METHODS: Written surveys addressing HPV knowledge and vaccine acceptability were administered to study participants from January to March 2007. An initial 32-question survey was completed, followed by an 8-minute educational video, and a post-video assessment. RESULTS: Out of 256 subjects, 73.0% watched the video and completed all surveys. Eighty percent of the subjects had heard of HPV, while 65.0% knew, prior to viewing the video, that the vaccine was available. Individual vaccine acceptability increased from 66.7% to 78.0% after the video (p=.0014). Prior to the video, 54.8% of subjects supported mandatory HPV vaccination, with 51.1% supporting school vaccination, and 66.7% accepting vaccination if it were free. After the video, these percentages increased to 72.6% (p<.0001), 65.1% (p<.0001) and 86.6% (p<.0001) respectively. Initially, 56.5% of subjects would vaccinate their child at 15 years of age or younger. After the video, 94.1% approved of vaccination from age 9 (p<.0001). Secondary analysis revealed Hispanics, African Americans, and lower income families were more likely to accept HPV vaccination after the video. A perception that vaccination promotes sex, and whether or not participants talk to their children about sex, did not affect acceptability. CONCLUSION: Using an educational video significantly increased overall HPV vaccine acceptability and acceptance in younger age groups. This may be an effective means of increasing awareness and acceptability of HPV vaccination.

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of gardasil given concomitantly with Menactra and Adacel.

OBJECTIVES: Multinational phase III trials of a human papillomavirus vaccine, Gardasil, have shown the vaccine to be generally well-tolerated, efficacious, and immunogenic. We evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of Gardasil administered concomitantly with Menactra and Adacel. METHODS: In this open-label study, boys (n = 394) and girls (n = 648) aged 10 to 17 were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio as follows: group A (concomitant administration) received a 0.5-mL dose of Gardasil at day 1, month 2, and month 6 and a 0.5-mL dose of Menactra and Adacel on day 1; group B (nonconcomitant administration) received Gardasil at day 1, month 2, and month 6 and Menactra and Adacel at month 1. Antibody levels for all vaccine components were measured. Systemic, injection-site, and serious adverse experiences (AEs) were monitored. RESULTS: Immune responses after concomitant administration of the 3 vaccines were noninferior to nonconcomitant administration. Seroconversion for Gardasil was > or = 99% in both groups A and B. For Menactra and Adacel, concomitant administration of the vaccines was demonstrated to be noninferior to nonconcomitant administration. Concomitant administration was generally well-tolerated. No participants withdrew because of an AE. One serious AE of transient muscular weakness of <24 hours' duration after the third Gardasil injection was reported in group B and was deemed possibly vaccine-related by the investigator. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, concomitant administration was generally well-tolerated and did not interfere with the immune response to the respective vaccines. Concomitant administration should minimize the number of visits required to deliver each vaccine individually, leading to increased compliance and more effective disease prevention.

Pregnancy and infant outcomes in the clinical trials of a human papillomavirus type 6/11/16/18 vaccine: a combined analysis of five randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To present a combined analysis of the pregnancy outcomes for women aged up to 45 years enrolled in five phase III clinical studies of the prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus 6/11/16/18 vaccine. METHODS: Twenty thousand five hundred fifty-one women aged 15-45 years received quadrivalent HPV vaccine or placebo at day 1 and months 2 and 6. Urine pregnancy tests were performed immediately before each injection; participants testing positive were not vaccinated. Women who became pregnant after enrollment were discontinued from further vaccination until resolution of pregnancy. All pregnancies were followed for outcomes. RESULTS: During the studies, 1,796 vaccine and 1,824 placebo recipients became pregnant, resulting in 2,008 and 2,029 pregnancies with known outcomes. No significant differences were noted overall for the proportions of pregnancies resulting in live birth, fetal loss, or spontaneous abortion. A total of 40 neonates born to vaccinated women and 30 neonates born to women given placebo had one or more congenital anomalies (P=.20). The anomalies were diverse and consistent with those most commonly observed in the general population. The vaccine was well tolerated among women who became pregnant. CONCLUSION: Administration of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine to women who became pregnant during the phase III clinical trials did not appear to negatively affect pregnancy outcomes. The vaccine is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration pregnancy category B medication (animal studies revealed no evidence of fetal harm, but there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women); however, vaccination is not recommended during pregnancy. Postlicensure surveillance is ongoing. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00092521, NCT00092534, NCT00092495, NCT00092547 and NCT00090220. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Subsequent pregnancy outcomes in patients with molar pregnancy and persistent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the subsequent reproductive outcomes in patients with complete and partial molar pregnancy and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) at the New England trophoblastic Disease Center between June 1, 1965, and December 31, 2007. STUDY DESIGN: Questionnaires regarding subsequent pregnancies were mailed to all patients with current mailing addresses at the New England Trophoblastic Disease Center. RESULTS: The subsequent reproductive outcomes in patients with complete and partial molar pregnancies and persistent GTN were in general the same as those in the general population. However, after an episode of molar pregnancy the incidence of molar pregnancy in a later gestation was approximately 1%. Additionally, after successful chemotherapy for GTN, the incidence of stillbirth was 1.4% in later pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Patients with molar pregnancies and GTN should be reassured that they can in general expect a normal future reproductive outcome.

Fertility-sparing surgery in 101 women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.

OBJECTIVES: Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is a precursor of invasive disease that is increasing in incidence primarily among reproductive-age women of low parity. Conization is an alternative to hysterectomy that allows future pregnancy, but has an inherent risk of residual AIS. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients treated by this fertility-sparing strategy over an extended period of surveillance. METHODS: Women diagnosed with cervical AIS who underwent primary fertility-sparing surgery with either loop excision or cold knife conization between 1993 and 2001 were identified at three institutions. A retrospective medical record review was performed. Patients 40 years of age and older and those undergoing hysterectomy within 12 months of diagnosis were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 101 women underwent cone biopsy and expectant management. The median age was 29 years. Fifty-seven percent were nulliparous and 23% primiparous. Cold knife conization was most commonly performed (69 vs. 32 procedures) and had a higher efficacy of achieving negative margins (72% vs. 47%; P=0.036). Thirty-five women had a total of 49 pregnancies during a mean follow-up of 51 months. Thirty-five gestations were delivered at term. There were two preterm births, eight spontaneous miscarriages, three elective terminations, and one ectopic pregnancy. Thirty-six patients had a repeat cone biopsy. Five ultimately underwent hysterectomy. No invasive cervical adenocarcinomas were observed during the study interval. CONCLUSION: Fertility-sparing surgery enables women with cervical AIS to achieve pregnancy with minimal risk of developing invasive disease during surveillance.